<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Thoughts on Patience, Political Nihilism, and Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipchristman.com/2009/12/17/some-thoughts-on-patience-political-nihilism-and-health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipchristman.com/2009/12/17/some-thoughts-on-patience-political-nihilism-and-health-care/</link>
	<description>One writer&#039;s web home.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:04:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://philipchristman.com/2009/12/17/some-thoughts-on-patience-political-nihilism-and-health-care/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipchristman.com/?p=59#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Enjoy hearing your thoughts as always Phil, and great to see you blogging again.

As a former Nadar Voter myself, who did some penance myself on my own blog a few years ago, I agree with the larger principle.

As for the example of the health care bill though, I&#039;m not so sure.  I guess the question is whether one sees this as a stepping stone towards further reform, or whether one sees this as a  bait and switch which is meant to con the public into thinking no further reform is necessary.  Based on what I&#039;ve been reading about the new bill lately, I&#039;m inclined to believe the latter.  I think it might almost be better to go down fighting with the ship this time, and then have a chance at bringing it up again a few years later, rather than to take the risk that this will end the reform.

I worry that the republicans have also set themselves up quite nicely as well.  Now that they&#039;ve gutted the bill, when it doesn&#039;t solve all the problems it is proported to solve, they&#039;re going to say, &quot;see, I told you so.  Goverment intervention only makes things worse.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy hearing your thoughts as always Phil, and great to see you blogging again.</p>
<p>As a former Nadar Voter myself, who did some penance myself on my own blog a few years ago, I agree with the larger principle.</p>
<p>As for the example of the health care bill though, I&#8217;m not so sure.  I guess the question is whether one sees this as a stepping stone towards further reform, or whether one sees this as a  bait and switch which is meant to con the public into thinking no further reform is necessary.  Based on what I&#8217;ve been reading about the new bill lately, I&#8217;m inclined to believe the latter.  I think it might almost be better to go down fighting with the ship this time, and then have a chance at bringing it up again a few years later, rather than to take the risk that this will end the reform.</p>
<p>I worry that the republicans have also set themselves up quite nicely as well.  Now that they&#8217;ve gutted the bill, when it doesn&#8217;t solve all the problems it is proported to solve, they&#8217;re going to say, &#8220;see, I told you so.  Goverment intervention only makes things worse.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
